Men's Under Armour Storm Tactical Patrol Pants Tactical Reviews, Deals, Problems and Guides

8.9
out of 10
8 Positive, 2 Mixed & 0 Negative
from 10 Reviews
Retail Price:
$79.99
Used Value:
$47.99
Sale Value:
$71.99
The Under Armour Tactical Patrol Pants are specifically designed to stand up to the rigors of field work without ripping, tearing or falling apart when you need them most. The ultra-durable polyester ripstop material prevents tears and abrasions, while maintaining comfort and long-lasting durability. Under Armour's Storm fabrication is water-resistant, but promotes breathability to keep you cool when on the move. These pants feature a reinforced crotch for a full range of motion, so there is no need to sacrifice maneuverability for comfort. There are multiple pockets to satisfy storage needs, and a hidden document pocket for quick access to IDs or mission-critical items. The elastic waistband is ideal for CCW use, and the offset belt loops are engineered to suit a variety of different holsters.

Specifications

Brand:

Full Reviews

5
Coming from a tactical stand point, I have been in the military and I am on a SWAT Team that is outfitted with 5.11 clothing. We are looking to move to a different clothing line so I ordered a pair of your UA tactical pant.

I like the over all feel of the pants. They are light weight and more comfortable than the 5.11's. I can't stand the deep back pockets on the 5.11 and the UA back pockets are why better.

The belt loops are not made for any type holster because the holster I run, I have skip a loop in order to have the holster where I need it.
I don't mind the buttons on the waistband but would prefer the snap but will have to see how the button holds up. The buttons on the cargo and back pockets probably should be Velcro for quicker and easier access.

The front pockets need to be a little more deeper because when I put my knife in the pocket it turns sideways and not straight up and down.

I don't like the plastic zipper but only time will tell if it holds up or not.

I would also like to see UA make built in knee pads which would be nice in a tactical pant.

As of now and this is my opinion, UA could lead the way in tactical clothing with a few changes. I own a lot of UA gear and I really like it. But that said, I feel Crye Precision is the best pant out there but they are really expensive. Don't get me wrong, I like the UA pant but it is not made for tactical wear, it is more set up for uniform patrol officers on the street.
Shawn, TacticalGear.com
May 3, 2016
10
This is not my first pair of these, but in fact my 4th......and my ONLY recommendation, please produce these in more colors! I also want to point out that UA stands behind their products, as does this site, so buying these is a no brainer.....a little expensive at the time of purchase, but longevity far outlast the initial expense! I am only buying new pairs, because I have put on some weight and needed to go up a size...that brought to my attention, the waist band. These have a little stretch in them, and that adds to the comfort of these and makes them a nice fit!
I RECOMMEND THAT ANYONE INTERESTED IN THESE, IGNORE THE PRICE AND PULL THE TRIGGER!!!
Coach Mac, TacticalGear.com
October 27, 2020
10
I was apprehensive about paying $75 for work pants!!! I was able to get 10% off with EMS discount so I said what the heck. If I don't like them I can send them back. They even sat on my counter over night. These pants are truly amazing!! The waist band makes them stay in place and not fall down when I stuff pockets with gear. They are perfect in waist rise. I will not buy any other pant from now on. They are light weight yet don't feel like paper. Under Armour has yet to let me down, should have never doubted them to begin with.
ML Whitfield, TacticalGear.com
February 4, 2016
10
These pants are really comfortable and pretty light too. Price is pretty reasonable too. Not sure how they would hold up on a 'tactical patrol' but for everyday wear and trips to the range they are great.
Neil B, TacticalGear.com
September 29, 2019
10
I like these pants a lot, I’m a FF/EMT and I’m not into the tatical ems pants that have a dozen pockets on them so these are great for me. Also they aren’t baggy and are professional looking. Only thing I’d change is the fact that the thigh pockets have a button to secure them shut so i normally just leave them open.
Ben, TacticalGear.com
March 13, 2018
10
Great pants. Fit is baggy, but if you hold things in pockets, you want them that way such as conceal carry (you don't want to print). Awesome.

Strong tactical look and feel.

Cargo pockets hold my iPhone Plus fine and a conceal carry G26 in a pocket holster perfectly.

Ok....., the BUTTONS! They are DIFFICULT to button and unbutton with one hand!!!
Bad Bad Bad! That has to be fixed.

Overall I am happy with the pants and they are worth the money and can easily be worn with a nice shirt for a night out on the town. Thumbs up!
JZ, TacticalGear.com
August 26, 2016
10
These are awesome pants. They are more breathable than the 5.11's and have a better feel against the skin. The only thing I don't like about them is the plastic zipper, I guess only time will tell if it will last. The front pockets are a little shorter than the 5.11's by about an inch and a half, but still have decent room. Still 5 stars for these amazing pants. Also it would be nice if Under Armour would include a pocket that is zippered to secure items for when you need to run.
Kevin Z., TacticalGear.com
April 19, 2016
8
Pant fits true to size. It's a very comfortable pant. The only negative is the pants pockets are shallow. Items sometimes fall out of them while sitting. Cargo pockets have a handy elastic band to hold cell phone, etc., in place.
Chris, TacticalGear.com
October 29, 2018
10
Just purchased and its been raining so I haven't had a chance to wear them hiking. They are going to be my hiking pants for my Peru trip. Comfortable and perfect fit.
Eric Mispilkin, TacticalGear.com
February 17, 2019
6
Ppants are way to baggy(meaning) they will rub eachother when walking making this annoying sound, i really wanted to like them and keep them but not for me.
Miguel C, TacticalGear.com
November 24, 2020